Why We Solve Others’ Problems But Struggle With Our Own: Understanding the Self-Other Gap
Understanding the Self-Other Asymmetry in Problem Solving
The self-other asymmetry refers to the paradox where we are often wise and objective for others but feel confused and stuck with our own issues. This typically occurs due to emotional involvement. When you face someone else’s problem, a friend’s relationship issue, or a colleague’s work stress, you maintain emotional distance, allowing clearer and logical thinking. Objectivity is easier because you’re less personally invested.
On the contrary, your own problems activate stress, anxiety, and self-doubt. You might catch yourself thinking, “What if I mess this up?” or “I can’t handle this,” which leads to mental noise and reduced cognitive flexibility. Emotional overload consumes mental energy, making it difficult to think innovatively or take decisive action. This is why sometimes you have a clear solution for others but feel paralyzed with your own dilemma.
The Role of Cognitive Biases and Self-Perception
We apply different internal rules when thinking about ourselves versus others. When your mind says, “I should have done better,” or “Why am I the only one struggling?” you amplify self-criticism and despair. This harsh self-judgment increases stress and limits problem-solving ability by focusing attention on negative emotions rather than practical options.
When it’s someone else’s problem, you naturally assume a more compassionate, balanced perspective. You tell yourself, “Everyone makes mistakes,” or “They’re doing the best they can.” This empathy opens the door to hopeful, actionable advice rather than overwhelming judgment.
You might also overcomplicate your own issues by fixating on details or worst-case scenarios. In contrast, viewing others’ difficulties allows seeing the problem’s core clearly and identifying straightforward next steps.
Psychological Distance and Perspective-Taking
Research shows that psychological distance, mentally stepping back from a problem, boosts creativity and clarity in problem-solving. When you imagine your problem happening to a friend or consider it in the distant future, emotional intensity decreases. This distance allows more objective, rational thinking.
You can try methods like journaling about your problem as if you’re an advisor or asking yourself, “What advice would I give my best friend if they were struggling with this?” or “How will I view this situation a year from now?” Such distancing techniques mimic the detachment that helps when solving others’ problems.
Emotional Factors and the Counselor’s Dilemma
The counselor’s dilemma refers to how therapists and helpers can guide others expertly but struggle with their own challenges. This reflects a universal human tendency to be emotionally overwhelmed by personal issues, which triggers self-doubt, denial, or avoidance.
Internal voices like, “I can’t let anyone see I’m struggling,” or “I should be stronger by now,” fuel shame and inhibit seeking support or clear thinking. Knowing this response is a normal psychological defense helps break the cycle of isolation and encourages more self-kindness.
Effective Strategies to Bridge the Self-Other Gap
If you struggle to solve your own problems but excel at helping others, these compassionate, evidence-based techniques may help:
Boosting Personal Growth Through Compassionate Problem-Solving
Recognizing the self-other asymmetry is a powerful moment of self-awareness. If you can extend empathy and insight to others, you already possess the qualities needed to treat yourself with equal care.
By integrating mindful practices, distancing techniques, and self-compassion, you can unlock new ways to solve problems and deepen your emotional strength. Frequent reminders like, “I deserve the same kindness I show others,” nurture self-trust and open the pathway to a richer, more empowered life.
0 Comments